Determination of shareholders’ welfare with financing quality as a moderating variable

Tengku Chandra Husnadi; Tatik Marianti; Tarisya Ramadhan

doi:10.33050/atm.v6i2.1799

Authors

Tengku Chandra Husnadi IEF Trisakti University
Tatik Marianti IEF Trisakti University
Tarisya Ramadhan University of Raharja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33050/atm.v6i2.1799

Keywords:

Islamic banks, shareholder welfare ratio (ROE), Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR), Low-cost funds ratio (CASA), Net Operating Margin Ratio (NOM), Fee Based Income Ratio (FIR) and Non-Performing Financing Ratio (NPF).

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that might affect the shareholder welfare ratio (ROE). These factors include independent variables consisting of financing distribution ratio (FDR), low-cost funds ratio (CASA), net operating margin ratio (NOM), expense-based income ratio (FIR), and Financing Quality ratio (NPF). Furthermore, to determine the relationship of Islamic bank performance indicators on shareholder welfare with the ROE ratio indicator, NPF is a moderate variable. The method used to analyze the holder's welfare ratio (ROE) is moderate regression analysis with the error error model (ECM). The research sample used is the entire research population, namely monthly data from the Islamic banking industry for the period 2012-2020 (consisting of 14 Islamic commercial banks and 20 Islamic business units). The results of this study note that in the long run: FDR has a positive and significant effect on the ROE ratio, the NOM ratio has a negative and significant effect on the ROE ratio. While the variables of CASA ratio, FIR ratio and NPF have no effect on the ROE ratio. Furthermore, the NPF Moderating Variable strengthens the relationship of all direct and significant variables with the Shareholder Welfare Ratio (ROE), namely NPF moderates the negative and significant effect of FDR on the ROE ratio, NPF moderates the positive and significant effect of the ratio. on the ROE ratio. Furthermore, other variables NPF Moderating Casa and FIR have no effect on the ROE ratio. For the short term: FIR has a positive and significant effect on the ROE ratio, the NOM ratio has a negative and significant effect on the ROE ratio. While the FDR ratio, CASA ratio and NPF ratio variables have no effect on the ROE ratio. Furthermore, the NPF variable strengthens the relationship of all variables directly and significantly to the Shareholder Welfare Ratio (ROE), namely NPF moderates the negative and significant effect of FIR on the roe ratio, NPF moderates the positive and significant effect of the ratio. on the ROE ratio. While other variables, moderate NPF, FDR and CASA, have no effect on the ROE ratio. The implication of this study is to measure the welfare of shareholders, in this case the performance of Islamic banks with the ROE ratio approach. Why is the welfare ratio of all shareholders (ROE) important, because in accordance with the existence of Islamic banks it aims to provide benefits (maslahah) for the ummah. Islamic banks in carrying out their mandate have a commitment to be able to provide expectations from shareholders in the company and be able to develop products that are in accordance with the wishes and needs of customers. So from this study it can be said that of the 5 variables that affect the price. financing distribution ratio (FDR), low cost funds ratio (CASA), net operating margin ratio (NOM), cost-based income ratio (FIR) and Financing Quality ratio (NPF).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, F., Aini, Q., Khoirunisa, A., & Nabila, E. A. (2020). Utilization of Blockchain Technology for Management E-Certificate Open Journal System. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 4(2), 133-138.

Hendriyati, P., Agustin, F., Rahardja, U., & Ramadhan, T. (2022). Management Information Systems on Integrated Student and Lecturer Data. APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM), 6(1), 1-9.

Rahardja, U., Lutfiani, N., & Amelia, S. (2019). Creative Content Marketing In Scientific Publication Management In Industrial Era 4.0. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 3(2), 168-177.

Aini, Q., Alwiyah, A., & Putri, D. M. (2019). Effectiveness of Installment Payment Management Using Recurring Scheduling to Cashier Performance. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 3(1), 13-21.

Aini, Q., Handayani, I., & Lestari, F. H. N. (2020). Utilization Of Scientific Publication Media To Improve The Quality Of Scientific Work. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 4(1), 1-12.

Maharani, A., Aninda, S., & Millah, S. (2021). Pembuatan Kartu Ujian Online Sebagai Pengabdian Perguruan Tinggi. ADI Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 8-14.

Yaniaja, A. K., Wahyudrajat, H., & Devana, V. T. (2020). Pengenalan Model Gamifikasi ke dalam E-Learning Pada Perguruan Tinggi. ADI Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 22-30.

Abdullah, D., Rahardja, U., & Oganda, F. P. (2021). Covid-19: Decentralized Food Supply Chain Management. Syst. Rev. Pharm, 12(3), 142-152.

Kosasi, S. (2020). Karakteristik Blockchain Teknologi Dalam Pengembangan Edukasi. ADI Bisnis Digit. Interdisiplin J, 1(1), 87-94.

Pambudi, A., Widayanti, R., & Edastama, P. (2021). Trust and Acceptance of E-Banking Technology Effect of Mediation on Customer Relationship Management Performance. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, 3(1), 87-96.

Santoso, R. E., Oganda, F. P., Harahap, E. P., & Permadi, N. I. (2021). Pemanfaatan Penggunaan Hyperlocal Marketing bagi Startup Bidang Kuliner di Tangerang. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 2(2), 60-65.

Wahyuningsih, T., Oganda, F. P., & Anggraeni, M. (2021). Design and Implementation of Digital Education Resources Blockchain-Based Authentication System. Blockchain Frontier Technology, 1(01), 74-86.

Rahardja, U., Lutfiani, N., Aini, Q., & Annisa, I. Y. (2021). The Potential Utilization of Blockchain Technology. Blockhain Front. Technol, 1(01), 57-67.

Sunarya, P. A., & Lutfiani, N. (2020). Analisis Sistem Sertifikasi Profesi Untuk Pengembangan Kompetensi Mahasiswa. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 1(1 Juni), 70-77.

Rahardja, U., Handayani, I., Lutfiani, N., & Oganda, F. P. (2020). An Interactive Content Media on Information System iLearning+. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 14(1), 57-68.

Rahardja, U., Lutfiani, N., & Juniar, H. L. (2019). Scientific Publication Management Transformation In Disruption Era. Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM), 3(2), 109-118.

Hardi, E. A. (2019). Fatwa DSN MUI dan Perkembangan Produk Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 6(1), 82-105.

Landali, A., & Yusuf, N. (2020). Metafora DOA sebagai makna laba dalam perspektif Islam. Imanensi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi Islam, 5(2), 116-125.

Yaniaja, A. K., Wahyudrajat, H., & Devana, V. T. (2020). Pengenalan Model Gamifikasi ke dalam E-Learning Pada Perguruan Tinggi. ADI Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 22-30.

Idrus, A. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor Internal dan Eksternal Terhadap Return On Equity (ROE). Misykat Al-Anwar, 29(2), 257186.

Irhamsyah, A. (2010). Analisis pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), biaya operasional terhadap pendapatan operasional (BOPO), dan Financing To Deposit Ratio (FDR) terhadap Return on Equity (ROE). lamsyah, H. (2012). Perkembangan dan Prospek Perbankan Syariah Indonesia: Tantangan Dalam Menyongsong MEA 2015. Milad Ke-8 Ikatan Ahli Ekonomi Islam (IAEI), (April 2012), 1–8.

Ihwanudin, N., Maulida, S., Ilham Akbar Fatriansyah, A., Sari Rahayu, S., Nugroho, L., Widyastuti, S., … Arzhi Jiwantara, F. (2020). Pengantar Perbankan Syariah (Konsep, Regulasi & Praktis). Widya Bhakti Persada Bandung. Retrieved from www.penerbitwidina.com

Jusmansyah, M., & Sriyanto, A. (2010). Analisis Pengaruh CAR, BOPO dan ROA Terhadap Non Performance Loan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 2(1), 46–65.

Rakhmansyah, M., Rahardja, U., Santoso, N. P. L., Khoirunisa, A., & Faturahman, A. (2021). Smart Digital Signature berbasis Blockchain pada Pendidikan Tinggi menggunakan Metode SWOT. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 2(1), 39-47.

Az-Zahra, R. S. A., Jaelani, A., & Nursi, M. (2021). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal Dan Integritas Karyawan Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) Pada PT. Bank KEB Hana Indonesia Wilayah Jakarta. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 2(2), 38-44.

Harriguna, T., & Wahyuningsih, T. (2021). Kemajuan Teknologi Modern untuk Kemanusiaan dan Memastikan Desain dengan Memanfaatkan Sumber Tradisional. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 2(1), 65-78.

Santoso, R. E., Oganda, F. P., Harahap, E. P., & Permadi, N. I. (2021). Pemanfaatan Penggunaan Hyperlocal Marketing bagi Startup Bidang Kuliner di Tangerang. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 2(2), 60-65.

Prawiyogi, A. G., Anwar, A. S., Yusup, M., Lutfiani, N., & Ramadhan, T. (2021). Pengembangan Program Studi Bisnis digital bagi pengusaha dengan perangkat lunak lean. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 2(2), 52-59.

Agustin, F., Oganda, F. P., Lutfiani, N., & Harahap, E. P. (2020). Manajemen Pembelajaran Daring Menggunakan Education Smart Courses. Technomedia Journal, 5(1 Agustus), 40-53.