Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

ATM accepts articles in any management-related subjects and any research methodology that meets the standards established for publications in the journal. The primary, but not exclusive, audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in business research.

The Journal aims to provide an intellectual and research platform for the dissemination of a range of information management, innovation, business economics, and international business and management development issues and technology impact on management. The primary criterion for publication in ATM is the significant contribution of the article makes to the literature in the management area, i.e., the significance and the novelty of the research and the rigor of the paper. The acceptance decision is made based on an independent review process that provides critically constructive and prompt evaluations of submitted manuscripts. ATM provides research articles, that include for these fields:

1. Information Management
2. Business Economics
3. Management Information System
4. Accounting
5. International Business
6. Management

Policy Section

Centang Open Script
Centang Indexed
Centang Peer-reviewed

Peer Review Process


ATM Journal documents


Articles accepted for processing are articles in accordance with the prescribed journal writing framework for more details, see here >>link<<


Articles accepted for processing are articles that have fulfilled journal checklists for more details, see here >>link<<


The article review process is divided into 2 stages, a review by an Editor and a review by Rivewer


The review process by the Editor will involve the process of checking the writing of articles where the approved articles are only articles with writing in accordance with the template


After the article review process by the Editor then the article will process back to be scanned (scan plagiarism) where the articles that pass the Editor's review stage are only articles with scanned results


Journals that have passed the review stage by the Editor will be reviewed again by 2 reviewers


Articles will be reviewed by reviewers for a maximum of 14 working days


The reviewer assessment process is entirely based on the results of the Reviewer assessment


The revision of the reviewer is no later than 7 days after the review results are submitted


Sending revisions that exceed the specified limit will be automatically rejected


Articles must be original with a plagiarism rate <30%


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles published in ATM are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) license and are freely available without charge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative’s (BOAI) definition of open access.


This journal utilizes the Indonesia One Search system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration..

This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in Aptisi Transactions On Management (ATM), including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher Asosiasi Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Indonesia  (APTISI).

Publication Ethics

This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Aptisi Transactions On Management (ATM),  is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.  

Asosiasi Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Indonesia  (APTISI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, APTISI and Editorial Board of ATM will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor in chief of Aptisi Transactions On Management (ATM) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The decision is based on the recommendation of the journal's editorial board members and reviewers. The journal abides by legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor confers with the editorial team and reviewers in making this decision.


The editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor, reviewers, and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial team, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by any of the editorial board members and reviewers in their own research.


Duties of Reviewers

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The journal uses double-blind review process. The reviewers advise the editor-in-chief in making the editorial decision. The editor-in-chief communicates with authors, as required, and helps them in improving quality of their research paper.

2. Promptness

The journal editors are committed to provide timely review to the authors. If a reviewer does not submit his/her report in a timely manner, the paper is immediately sent to another qualified reviewer.

3. Confidentiality

Manuscript content is treated with at most confidentiality. The journal uses double blind process. Except for the editor-in-chief, the editors and reviewers cannot discuss paper with any other person, including the authors.

4. Standards of Objectivity

The editors and reviewers are required to evaluate papers based on the content. The review comment must be respectful of authors. The reviewers are required to justify their decision and recommendation.

5. Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Duties of Authors

1. Reporting standards

Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work wherever possible. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

2. Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. They should be prepared to provide such data within reasonable time.

3. Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and authors are so advised.

4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

When a paper is submitted for possible publication, the submitting author makes a written statement that the paper has not been published not it is currently under publication with any other journal. Simultaneous submission is considered unethical and is therefore unacceptable.

5. Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others is required. Authors must cite publications that have led to the authors’ current research.

6. Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscript. The corresponding author has a responsibility to keep co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to give a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.

7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

9. Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Editorial and Editing Process

Author Fees

Aptisi Transactions on Management (ATM) does not charge to the author :

(1) Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR), the author does not pay article submission fees as part of the submission process of articles in Aptisi Transactions On Management (ATM).

(2) The Article Publication: 0.00 (IDR), if the article has been accepted for publication, the author does not pay the publication fee in ATM.


DOI: 10.34306 by Crossref

Aptisi Transaction on Management Indexed in:


Screening for Plagiarism

Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be filtered for plagiarism using ithenticate applications with a similar level of maximum 20% when published.

The submitted manuscript would be check for plagiarism using by:


Waiver Policy

All article published in ATM: Aptisi Transactions on Management are Open Access. Open Access Publishing implies that all readers, anywhere in the world, are allowed unrestricted access to full text of article, immediately on publication in ATM. No payment is collected from the readers for accessing and using the articles.

Self-Archiving of Papers Published Open Access

Authors publishing open access are encouraged to deposit the final published PDF in their institutional repository or any suitable subject repository on publication. Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the URL of the published article on the journal's website; in all cases, the requirement to link to the journal’s website is designed to protect the integrity and authenticity of the scientific record, with the online published version on the journal’s website clearly identified as the definitive version of record.